Course feedback 2 Semester 20162017 |
| Course : COL633 Slot : E | Total students in course : 19 | Feedback received from : 15 |
|---|
Lecture Component |
| Course Organization & Delivery | Learning | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | |
| Poor (1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Average (2) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Good (3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Very Good (4) | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Excellent (5) | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| No Opinion (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rating | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.33 | 4.4 | 4.47 | 4.2 | 4.33 | 4.13 | 4.13 | 4.07 |
| Overall Rating : 4.27 |
|---|
|
QUESTIONS:- Course Organization & Delivery Q1. How clearly was the course plan presented? Q2. Did the course content met course objectives adequately? Q3. How were the lectures organized in terms of clarity and presentation of concepts? Q4. How effectively could the teacher communicate? Q5. How receptive was the teacher to questions inside and outside the classroom? Q6. How much did the teacher encourage independent thinking? Q7. How much did the teacher encourage logical thinking? Learning Q1. How much did the course help you learn the subject? Q2. How effective was the teacher(s) in keeping your interest alive in the course? Q3. To what extent did the teacher(s) inspire you to pursue the subject area further? |
| Exams & Evaluation | General Questions | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q1 | ||
| Yes | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 13 | Just Right | 8 |
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | Too Light | 0 |
| No Opinion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | Too Heavy | 7 |
| No Opinion | 0 | |||||||||||||
|
QUESTIONS:- Exams & Evaluation Q1. Did the examinations test understanding of the course? Q2. Were the question papers of an appropriate length? Q3. Was the evaluation prompt? Q4. Were the evaluated answer scripts shown to you? Q5. Did the evaluation help you to understand your mistakes? General Questions Q1. Were the lectures held regularly? Q2. Were the lectures held on time? Q3. Was the course evaluation policy announced at the beginning of the semester? Q4. Was the attendance policy announced at the beginning of the semester? Q5. Did the teacher take note of the mid-semester feedback? Q6. Was there a significant variation among the different lecture sections? Q7. Would you consider this course as one of the five best-taught courses you have done so far? Q1. How would you rate the work-load of this course? |
|
Q. No. 1 : What did you like the most about this course? (Responses: 11) 1. Awesome Lectures and Great Assignments and Homework In short Everything 2. everything 3. Well structured and informative Gave deep insights about the working of OS 4. Homeworks and Assignments 5. Very well structured course 6. when i first studied OS it was very basic and the real complexity behind such a system wasn t explained or even touched this course helped me to actually understand all of this 7. Professor s way of teaching 8. Fine structure Very detailed discussion 9. The course content 10. learning through xv6 11. Use of an example OS to teach the principles of the subject xv6 s code helped a lot to understand various concepts Q. No. 2 : What did you dislike the most about this course? (Responses: 10) 1. Due to lesser speed in the beginning we had to speed up covering contents towards the end though it is not a huge problem as pace was managable 2. nothing 3. Nothing 4. N A 5. Nothing 6. nothing specifically 7. Cumulative assignments If someone is unable to do an earlier lab its effect can be seen in the future labs as well Better Labs independent to each other or if cumulative correct solutions for the earlier labs are used while merging the new files 8. Too much trivial assignment work 9. Nothing 10. restriction of concepts taught mostly to only what are needed for xv6 Q. No. 3 : Any Suggestions or comments about the course. (Responses: 8) 1. Nothing 2. None 3. N A 4. All good 5. allow post grads to work in pairs that s all it would ve been done better we already had to do more assignments and take all the exams 6. I personally liked the course very much Earlier I had no idea about this field Now I am able to understand it well Thanks to Sorav sir 7. None 8. No |
Practical Component |
| Design of experiments | Organization of lab and conduct of experiments | Evaluation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q1 | Q2 | ||
| Poor (1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Yes | 10 | 10 |
| Average (2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | No | 3 | 3 |
| Good (3) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | No Opinion | 2 | 2 |
| Very Good (4) | 9 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 6 | |||
| Excellent (5) | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | |||
| No Opinion (0) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
| Question-wise rating | 4.07 | 4.07 | 4.13 | 3.93 | 3.71 | |||
| Overall Rating : 3.98 |
|---|
|
QUESTIONS:- Design of experiments Q1. To what extent did the experiments provide new insights and /or encourage you to think creatively? Q2. Were adequate background material / instructions provided for carrying out the experiments? Organization of lab and conduct of experiments Q1. To what extent was systematic execution of lab work emphasized? Q2. To what extent was analysis of observations/ results encouraged? Q3. To what extent was the teacher involved in the practical work? Evaluation Q1. Was the feedback on your lab performance prompt? Q2. Was the feedback on your laboratory work useful? |
|
Q. No. 1 : What did you like most about this course? (Responses: 9) 1. Awesome Lectures and Great Assignments and Homework In short Everything 2. everythinng 3. Got to know how the even most basic things work under the hood 4. Homeworks and Assignments 5. Everything is available to students like Labs help session video lectures notes etc 6. what i mentioned previously 7. Professor s way of teaching 8. The labs gave a complete insight to how an operating system is structured 9. HoHLabs were quite interesting Q. No. 2 : What did you dislike the most about this course? (Responses: 7) 1. Starting few labs were given more time but last labs were given less and learning does not happen when we try very fast so we were just trying to finish labs and did not learn much So please give less time for first two labs and more to next two 2. nothing 3. Nothing 4. N A 5. Nothing 6. what i mentioned previously 7. Cumulative assignments If someone is unable to do an earlier lab its effect can be seen in the future labs as well Better Labs independent to each other or if cumulative correct solutions for the earlier labs are used while merging the new files Q. No. 3 : How effective was the help provided by the teaching assistants? (Responses: 10) 1. Very Good 2. very good 3. Good 4. excellent 5. 10 on the scale of 1 to 10 6. helpful enough 7. TAs were undoubtedly helpful in the labs Some of the labs would not have been possible without the sessions held 8. The teaching assistants were highly co operative 9. very helpful 10. Most of the times TAs were responsive in clarifying doubts Q. No. 4 : Were the facilities/equipments adequate for the experiments? (Responses: 10) 1. Yes 2. yes 3. Yes 4. N A 5. Yes 6. yes 7. Yes 8. yes 9. yes 10. Yes Q. No. 5 : Any Suggestions or comments about the course (Responses: 6) 1. It was a great course sir Thanks for teaching and giving us this experience 2. None 3. N A 4. All good 5. already written above 6. I personally liked the course very much Earlier I had no idea about this field Now I am able to understand as well as implement it well Thanks to Sorav sir |